Dataset · V 2026.2.0 ← Read the benchmark article

2026 Fintech AI Visibility Benchmark -- Dataset

We measured 50 distinct fintech and payments companies in 51 vertical placements across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity. This is the full dataset for the benchmark article -- all scores, all placements, all verticals.

50Distinct Companies
51Placements
8Verticals
4Engines
16Queries
64Total Runs

CSV contains company, vertical, Domain Rating, V score, tier, query appearances, A%, E%. Collection date: June 2, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.

How to Cite This Dataset
DIGI CONVO. (2026). 2026 Fintech AI Visibility Benchmark Dataset.
Version 2026.2.0. Published June 2, 2026.
https://digiconvo.ai/research/datasets/fintech-ai-visibility-benchmark-2026
License: CC BY 4.0

Key Findings

8 / 51 placements Highly Visible

Placements appeared consistently across 3 or more engines. Stripe (85), Wise (85), Stripe Connect/Treasury (85), Adyen (80), nCino (80), Kyriba (80), Unit (75), Mambu (75).

8 / 51 placements Invisible

Zero appearances across all queries and all four engines. Rapyd, Remitly, WorldFirst, i2c, Sift, Featurespace, Provenir, Peach Finance.

29 / 51 placements Gray Zone

Appeared in some engines, for some queries -- but not consistently. This is the dominant condition in fintech AI visibility.

39 pts Biggest swing

One company scored 31 on generic queries and 70 on matched-framing queries. Same engines, different question, different outcome.

Tier distribution across 51 placements

Tier distribution across 51 placements Highly Visible 16% · 8 placements Partially Visible 57% · 29 placements Low Visibility 12% · 6 placements Invisible 16% · 8 placements Source: DIGI CONVO 2026 Fintech AI Visibility Benchmark · digiconvo.ai/research/fintech-ai-visibility-benchmark-2026

Complete Score Table

51 placements
Company ⇕ Vertical DR ⇕ V Score ↓ Tier Query Appearances (of 8) ⇕ A% E%
Stripe (Connect/Treasury) Embedded Finance / BaaS 95 85
Highly Visible 8/8 100% 100%
Stripe Payments Processing 95 85
Highly Visible 8/8 100% 100%
Wise Cross-Border Payments 89 85
Highly Visible 8/8 100% 100%
Adyen Payments Processing 88 80
Highly Visible 7/8 88% 100%
nCino Credit / Loan Origination 72 80
Highly Visible 7/8 88% 100%
Kyriba Treasury / Cash Management 71 80
Highly Visible 7/8 88% 100%
Unit Embedded Finance / BaaS 62 75
Highly Visible 6/8 75% 100%
Mambu Banking Infrastructure 71 75
Highly Visible 6/8 75% 100%
Embedded Finance Platform A Embedded Finance / BaaS 44 70
Partially Visible 5/8 63% 100%
Marqeta Embedded Finance / BaaS 71 70
Partially Visible 5/8 63% 100%
Trovata Treasury / Cash Management 60 70
Partially Visible 5/8 63% 100%
Lithic Embedded Finance / BaaS 55 65
Partially Visible 4/8 50% 100%
Worldpay Payments Processing 85 65
Partially Visible 4/8 50% 100%
Thought Machine Banking Infrastructure 69 65
Partially Visible 4/8 50% 100%
10x Banking Banking Infrastructure 57 65
Partially Visible 4/8 50% 100%
Finxact Banking Infrastructure 57 65
Partially Visible 4/8 50% 100%
Socure Risk / Fraud / AML 72 65
Partially Visible 4/8 50% 100%
ComplyAdvantage Risk / Fraud / AML 74 65
Partially Visible 4/8 50% 100%
Blend Credit / Loan Origination 77 65
Partially Visible 4/8 50% 100%
Checkout.com Payments Processing 80 59
Partially Visible 4/8 50% 75%
Braintree / PayPal Payments Processing 88 59
Partially Visible 4/8 50% 75%
PayQuicker ** Payout / Disbursement 47 59
Partially Visible 4/8 50% 75%
Alloy Risk / Fraud / AML 72 59
Partially Visible 4/8 50% 75%
Finastra Credit / Loan Origination 75 59
Partially Visible 4/8 50% 75%
Tipalti Payout / Disbursement 78 54
Partially Visible 3/8 38% 75%
Payoneer Payout / Disbursement 84 54
Partially Visible 3/8 38% 75%
Hyperwallet Payout / Disbursement 78 54
Partially Visible 3/8 38% 75%
Galileo Banking Infrastructure 70 54
Partially Visible 3/8 38% 75%
Temenos Banking Infrastructure 76 54
Partially Visible 3/8 38% 75%
LoanPro Credit / Loan Origination 58 54
Partially Visible 3/8 38% 75%
Nomentia Treasury / Cash Management 54 54
Partially Visible 3/8 38% 75%
Sardine Risk / Fraud / AML 68 48
Partially Visible 3/8 38% 50%
Synctera Embedded Finance / BaaS 51 43
Partially Visible 2/8 25% 50%
OFX Cross-Border Payments 72 43
Partially Visible 2/8 25% 50%
Currencycloud Cross-Border Payments 73 43
Partially Visible 2/8 25% 50%
HighRadius Treasury / Cash Management 74 43
Partially Visible 2/8 25% 50%
Coupa Pay Treasury / Cash Management 79 43
Partially Visible 2/8 25% 50%
Treasury Prime Embedded Finance / BaaS 50 31
Low Visibility 1/8 13% 25%
Square / Block Payments Processing 93 31
Low Visibility 1/8 13% 25%
Nuvei Payments Processing 77 31
Low Visibility 1/8 13% 25%
Trolley Payout / Disbursement 64 31
Low Visibility 1/8 13% 25%
Airwallex Payout / Disbursement 79 31
Low Visibility 1/8 13% 25%
Unit21 Risk / Fraud / AML 63 31
Low Visibility 1/8 13% 25%
Rapyd Payments Processing 75 0
Invisible 0/8 0% 0%
Remitly Cross-Border Payments 78 0
Invisible 0/8 0% 0%
WorldFirst Cross-Border Payments 73 0
Invisible 0/8 0% 0%
i2c Banking Infrastructure 61 0
Invisible 0/8 0% 0%
Sift Risk / Fraud / AML 80 0
Invisible 0/8 0% 0%
Featurespace Risk / Fraud / AML 65 0
Invisible 0/8 0% 0%
Provenir Credit / Loan Origination 55 0
Invisible 0/8 0% 0%
Peach Finance Credit / Loan Origination 39 0
Invisible 0/8 0% 0%

Stripe appears in two verticals: Stripe Connect/Treasury (Embedded Finance / BaaS) and Stripe (Payments Processing). These are scored separately because they compete in distinct buyer contexts.

Benchmark collected: June 2, 2026. V = 0.40·A + 0.25·E + 0.20·D. Maximum score approximately 85 under 2026 methodology. A% = Appearance Rate. E% = Engine Breadth.

** PayQuicker is a current DIGI CONVO client. This benchmark applies identical methodology to PayQuicker as to all 51 placements. No score adjustments were made. Results are reported as measured.

Domain Rating sourced from Ahrefs, subdomains mode, August 2026. Visibility scores were collected June 2, 2026. The two metrics were captured at different times; Domain Rating moves slowly enough that the gap does not materially affect the comparison, but both dates are disclosed.

Analysis of these results, including the four findings that were not predicted before collection, is published in the benchmark article.


Scoring Methodology

V = 0.40·A + 0.25·E + 0.20·D

ComponentSymbolWeightWhat it measures
Appearance RateA40%% of a vertical's 8 possible runs where the company was named
Engine BreadthE25%How many of the 4 engines cited the company in at least one query
Query DepthD20%D receives full credit once a company appears in at least one relevant benchmark query

Under the 2026 baseline model, the maximum achievable score is approximately 85. The remaining 15% is reserved for Citation Strength and Position Score components planned for the 2027 benchmark.

2 queries per vertical × 8 verticals = 16 total queries. All queries unassisted -- brand names excluded from the prompt.

Prompt template: "List the leading [query text] solutions. For each, briefly explain why you would recommend it and what distinguishes it from competitors."

Q# Vertical Query
1Embedded Finance / BaaSbest embedded finance platform for building card programs
2Embedded Finance / BaaSbest unified embedded finance platform
3Payments Processingbest payment processor for SaaS companies
4Payments Processingbest global payment processor for enterprise
5Payout / Disbursementbest payout platform for direct selling companies
6Payout / Disbursementbest global payout orchestration platform
7Cross-Border Paymentsbest cross-border payments platform for businesses
8Cross-Border Paymentsbest B2B international payment API
9Banking Infrastructurebest cloud-native core banking platform
10Banking Infrastructurebest banking-as-a-service infrastructure for neobanks
11Risk / Fraud / AMLbest AML compliance platform for fintech
12Risk / Fraud / AMLbest identity decisioning platform for digital banking
13Credit / Loan Originationbest loan origination platform for banks
14Credit / Loan Originationbest digital lending platform for SMB lenders
15Treasury / Cash Managementbest treasury management system for midmarket companies
16Treasury / Cash Managementbest API-first cash management platform
  • Engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity
  • Session type: Private / incognito browsing, logged-out
  • Location: US-based IP address
  • Collection date: June 2, 2026
  • Method: Responses captured manually and reviewed for company mentions using a standardized scoring rubric
  • Query type: All unassisted -- brand names excluded from all prompts
  • Total runs: 16 queries × 4 engines = 64 runs

This benchmark uses 2 queries per vertical. The 2027 benchmark will expand to 10 queries per vertical for broader buyer-intent coverage. Scores reflect a single-day collection window. AI engine responses are non-deterministic and change over time. This is a dated snapshot, not a permanent ranking.

Planned for 2027

  • →Position Score -- first vs. buried in response
  • →Citation Authority -- trade press vs. vendor blog weighting
  • →10 queries per vertical
  • →Multi-week collection window

Downloads

Score Dataset (CSV) 50 distinct companies in 51 vertical placements. Domain Rating, V Score, Tier, Query Appearances, A%, E%. UTF-8.
CC BY 4.0 Download CSV
Score Dataset (JSON) Same data in JSON format. Preferred by developers and AI systems.
Browser-generated
Query Log All 16 queries, 4 engines, returned companies per run.
Raw runs data

Version History

VersionDateNotes
2026.2.0 August 10, 2026 Added Domain Rating column. Clarified the sample as 50 distinct companies measured in 51 vertical placements; Stripe is measured in two vertical contexts.
2026.1.0 June 2, 2026 Initial release. 50 companies, 8 verticals, 16 queries, 2 queries per vertical.

Update Policy

This benchmark is updated annually. The 2027 edition will expand to 10 queries per vertical, add Position Score and Citation Authority components, and use a multi-week collection window. A methodology note will be published if AI engine behavior shifts significantly before the next annual update.